Skip to main content

The coming crisis in the British Public Sector

Once upon a time there was an Island country that had an independent civil service. This civil service attracted many good brains and so was a finely honed tool of administration. Senior leaders of the civil service were not extravagantly paid- indeed they usually earned less than their equivalent in the private sector, but there were regular perks: Knighthoods for the big bosses and good gongs for the rest that help to recompense the lack. In addition there was a pension that was non contributory and index linked, so overall the civil service was not that badly off. There was a certain "flexibility" too- since decision making was private mistakes could occasionally be overlooked and therefore not blight the careers of those involved: Ministers were responsible for their departments, and if the mistakes that were made were serious enough, then the Minister would have to carry the can and resign. As The Economist points out, this week, much has changed

Over time the public sector became less fashionable and struggled to attract the cream of the graduates that it had once enjoyed. Salaries began to rise substantially. Over the five years to 2006 the number of senior civil servants earning over £100,000 tripled. Even areas that were nominally autonomous, although funded by the state, like the Health Service, saw pay scales soar. The average GP was soon earning over £100,000 too. The British National Health Service, which had not delivered adequate service for some time, despite the earnest ideals of the 1946 National Health Service Act, but had at least been relatively cheap, now became both inadequate and expensive.

Further blows followed. Public sector pensions also increased vastly in cost- no longer could the unfunded pensions be ignored, when the cost the average British family over £900 a year. The attractiveness of public sector pensions led to vast- but entirely legal-fiddles, where huge pensions could be purchased for minimal outlay, provided that the employee stayed in the state sector, and final salary schemes continued unchecked- opening up a gigantic deficit in the public pensions systems.

Perhaps unsurprisingly the Army began to become involved in the pillaging of the public purse. The value of projected PFI projects contracted for equipment and training exceeded the entire military budget for 2006- an estimated cost of over £35 billion.

While nominal inflation remained low in the economy as a whole, the cost inflation rate for the public sector became a massive multiple of costs elsewhere. The projected increases in the role of public sector proposed by Gordon Brown did not take into account the even larger increases in unfunded pension liabilities which multiplied the overall costs dramatically.

Sterling interest rates- already at a considerable premium to Euro rates- began to increase more rapidly than the UKs competitors....

What happens next?

Brown has not delivered prudence, he has delivered accounting adjustments (and statistical fiddles). The cost of the public sector, nominally sustainable, is in fact out of control.

The consequences, together with the pressures on the British Housing Market point to a serious downturn. The bond market- trading on an inverted yield curve-already predicts this.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

Bournemouth absence

Although I had hoped to get down to the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth this year, simple pressure of work has now made that impossible. I must admit to great disappointment. The last conference before the General Election was always likely to show a few fireworks, and indeed the conference has attracted more headlines than any other over the past three years. Some of these headlines show a significant change of course in terms of economic policy. Scepticism about the size of government expenditure has given way to concern and now it is clear that reducing government expenditure will need to be the most urgent priority of the next government. So far it has been the Liberal Democrats that have made the running, and although the Conservatives are now belatedly recognising that cuts will be required they continue to fail to provide even the slightest detail as to what they think should guide their decisions in this area. This political cowardice means that we are expected to ch