Skip to main content

Russia crumbles further

As the potential Arab revolt rumbles on further, the events of last week in Russia have been forgotten by the media already. The "24 hour news agenda" by definition is not good at analysis or understanding. Yet the impact of the bomb at Domodedovo is still reverberating across the Russian body politic.

It was a brutal and disgusting crime- and the bloody death toll and horrible injuries that the suicide bomber wreaked upon the innocent can only be condemned by any decent individual. There are no reasons and no excuses for the people responsible.

Alas, that the failures of the Russian power structures have allowed the emergence of this kind of Al-Qaida inspired evil. As Wiki-Leaks revealed, the US assessment of Russia is that it is now entirely in the hands of contending, largely criminal, elites. A convenient simplification would be to say that power is divided up between different Mafia families, who have different interests in different industrial sectors and in different parts of the country. These interests are balanced by negotiations and occasionally by violence. Thus the idea that the Russian government exists as a monolith under the steel will of a single leadership is somewhat inaccurate. The group of five or so individuals around Prime Minister Putin are only the largest and most feared of these contending elites. Strongly Mercantilist, these groups trade favours, and where necessary punishments. Yet there is no clear strategy- only the short term need to gain control over assets and to ship the income derived from these assets out of Russia as fast as is practical. Liquidity is king in the under invested and increasingly decrepit Russian economy.

Meanwhile there are large areas that have been excluded from the process of trading favours. In particular the North Caucasus has become simply a battleground where only the most brutal can maintain even the most tenuous foothold. The deliberate flooding of the area with weapons by "dissident" members of the army (which kills roughly 3000 of its own conscripts every year) has made the turf disputes in the North Caucasian Republics, whether Chechen, Ingush, Ossete or Dhagestani into a festering, if relatively low intensity, war. The latest bomb in Moscow is merely a symptom, and not the most deadly, of the roiling violence of the North Caucasus. Yet increasingly the Russian writ does not hold at all in that part of the Russian Federation. A combination of neglect and brutality has totally undermined the rule of law and the erosion at the centre has become a collapse at the periphery. As racist violence emerges in the Russian heartland against those from the Caucasus, it is hard to see how the two groups can share the same state for much longer.

Russia is fraying at the edges- yet the consequences may yet push the Caucasian Republics into a still more deadly pattern of outrage and revenge. In the meantime, the West, lead by the US considers that the "reset" policy towards the Russian state has been a mild success.

It has not.

Russia may not be the strategic threat that the Soviet Union was, but the appallingly cynical and corrupt Russian state that has been created on the ashes is unstable and occasionally malevolent. Those who are locked out of the Putinista system of contending Mafias no longer believe that they can achieve anything by peaceful means, and the level of violence is therefore likely to grow.

The attack on Domodedovo was a deliberate attack on foreigners, and more and more they will be targeted as a way of getting attention and of reducing Putinista access to outside interest and money.

A witches brew of religion and nationalism has been cooked up under the reign of the Siloviki. It may yet be the rest of the world that suffers the consequences.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

Bournemouth absence

Although I had hoped to get down to the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth this year, simple pressure of work has now made that impossible. I must admit to great disappointment. The last conference before the General Election was always likely to show a few fireworks, and indeed the conference has attracted more headlines than any other over the past three years. Some of these headlines show a significant change of course in terms of economic policy. Scepticism about the size of government expenditure has given way to concern and now it is clear that reducing government expenditure will need to be the most urgent priority of the next government. So far it has been the Liberal Democrats that have made the running, and although the Conservatives are now belatedly recognising that cuts will be required they continue to fail to provide even the slightest detail as to what they think should guide their decisions in this area. This political cowardice means that we are expected to ch